-
Hasan posted an update
-
😔i have been trying out so many business ideas for more than 3 years now and none has been successful. I want it to be just perfect and in the end it does not work and I abandon. I also admit I have not been really serious with the businesses. Working on making my very first dollar online soon. I pray it works with your enormous guidance so far.
-
@salvanus-gah-mutiyevalla please send me a private message sharing more about your business ideas and your experience
-
-
I had this ambitious plan chatting with chatGPT made it seem as if everything was possible: MBRACE Movement homepage as a hub of value, with your first flag planted around energy + dignity + sustainability for car-dwellers / nomads / low-income explorers. I’ll break it into Core Message, Homepage Structure Mockup, and Brand Ladder → Long-Term Expansion. 🔑 Core Message If we boil it all down to a single heartbeat: “MBRACE is about power, dignity, and community for people living on the move — offering resources, stories, and solutions that make life safer, cleaner, and more sustainable.” * Not charity, not activism rhetoric. * It’s empowerment + survival + sustainability. * Neutral but empathetic. 🏠 Homepage Structure Mockup 1. Hero Section (Above the Fold) * Headline: “Power & Dignity, Wherever You Are.” * Sub-headline: “MBRACE is a movement for nomads, car-dwellers, and explorers — delivering practical energy solutions, safe living tips, and community-driven resources.” * Call-to-action buttons: * “Read Articles” (blog hub) * “Get Resources” (tools, grants, guides) 2. Value Pillars (Three Icons/Blocks) * Energy Access → solar, battery, safe charging * Safe Living → parking laws, hygiene, tips * Community Stories → dignity, resilience, creativity 3. Featured Articles / Guides * “10 Safe Overnight Parking Resources (2025)” * “How to Stretch Power: Solar & Battery Basics” * “Grants + Low-Cost Programs for Car Dwellers” 4. Movement Section * Quote or story snippet (personal or community) * Button: “Join the MBRACE Movement” → newsletter / blog subscription 5. Partnerships / Future Vision * A simple banner: “Building bridges with tech, energy, and sustainability companies who care about dignity and access.” * Logos or placeholders for partner orgs (future). 6. Footer * Links to Blog, About, Resources, Contact. * Community Guidelines disclaimer (keeps tone safe & respectful). 🪜 Brand Ladder → Long-Term Expansion Right now, Phase 1 is blog + homepage = credibility and trust. But build with expansion in mind: 1. Phase 1 (Now): * Blog articles on sustainable energy, safe car-living, survival tips. * Messaging that frames MBRACE as supportive + practical. 2. Phase 2: * Toolkits (interactive resource map, grant databases). * “MBRACE Guides” (downloadable PDFs). 3. Phase 3: * MBRACE hardware/software (like your battery/tech hub idea). * Community-powered forums or app. 4. Phase 4: * Policy / advocacy arm (still neutral, framed as “solutions not slogans”). 🎯 Positioning * Audience: Nomads, car-dwellers, urban explorers, plus allies. * Tone: Hopeful, practical, inclusive, non-partisan. * Brand Ladder Core: Survival → Sustainability → Empowerment → Movement.Initial Vision and Platform Rungs MBRACE originated from the observation of systemic pressures like grid instability, nomadism, solar adoption, and the e-waste crisis, coupled with rising housing and energy costs, which contributed to the growth of urban car dwelling. The initial concept envisioned a four-rung platform:
1. The Storytelling Engine (mbrace.to): Aimed at building emotional connection through narratives, hero videos, #vanlife testimonials, and stories of energy independence. The tone was designed to be conversational, inspiring, and rallying, with bold visuals. The founder’s personal story of living in a car for five months was central to this rung, fostering authenticity and emotional buy-in.
2. Education & Empowerment (mbraceinsight.com): Focused on making users knowledgeable about energy independence and sustainability through guides like “Solar for Beginners” and practical tools like solar calculators. This rung aimed to earn trust by providing valuable, free knowledge.
3. Community & Participation (mbrace.to/community): Intended to engage users through submitted stories, energy hacks, and challenges, thereby fostering a “tribe” and providing social proof.
4. Vision & Future Roadmap: Culminating in the vision statement: “MBRACE Core — True power is connection”.
App Development and “Good Neighbor” Ethos The concept evolved to include a mobile application, with features designed to be “Apple-clean” and user-friendly. Key components included:
• A Home Screen Widget for quick glances at battery status, safe spots, and tips.
• A Map View with clustered pins for various topics (sleep, facilities, power, safety), search functionality, and auto-compiled guides. The map was to focus on legal and public places such as Rest Stops, Walmarts (with crowd-verified policies), Truck Stops, Church Lots (officially listed), and Public Lands (BLM/National Forest).
• A Feed View showcasing newest/nearby tips, summarized into 3-5 practical bullet points with source links.
• A Data Ingestion Pipeline leveraging official APIs (like Reddit API) to fetch, classify, geocode, summarize, and moderate content, ensuring safety and policy compliance (e.g., no doxxing, redaction of private info).
A defining principle for the app was the “good neighbor” ethos, advocating for clean vehicles, respectful use of facilities (e.g., Planet Fitness for showers, public restrooms), and adherence to posted rules to prevent increased enforcement against car dwellers.Ethical and Privacy Considerations The development process was highly sensitive to Apple’s strict privacy guidelines. The app was designed to be privacy-preserving, utilizing “When-In-Use” location authorization, allowing approximate location, and explicitly stating that it would not sell personal data. Transparency was key, with clear privacy policies and community guidelines. Initially, “police interaction scripts” were considered but later deemed too controversial and risky for the app’s launch strategy.
Audience Segmentation and Solar Energy Focus The target audience was refined from a broad group to distinct segments: financially-strained car dwellers, digital nomads/van lifers, and urban explorers/weekend warriors. The initial validation focused on the economically-strained urban car dweller, whose needs for safety, legality, and dignity are most acute and align with the founder’s personal experience.
Solar energy was identified as a critical opportunity to decrease costs and increase energy independence. Content would include realistic solar expectations, system sizing for car dwellers, and urban solar strategies, differentiating MBRACE from generic solar advice.Business Model Evolution and Pivots The business model underwent several significant shifts:
• Initial Monetization: Planned for preorders, waitlists, a free app with a Pro subscription, B2B insights, and sponsored pins.
• Critiques and Challenges: Concerns arose regarding the value proposition for a financially-strained audience, difficulties in data acquisition compared to competitors like iOverlander, and the long timeline for B2B revenue. The “legal-only” content strategy was seen as limiting the market.
• Pivot to “Community & Content Hub”: This proposed a subscription-based, members-only platform offering a “Living Guide” of curated content (e.g., “Planet Fitness Playbook,” “Legal Survival 101”) and a private, moderated community space, moving away from location data as the primary value.
• Pivot to “Value-First, Monetize-Second”: Acknowledging the difficulty of charging upfront, this model proposed launching for free, focusing on user acquisition and trust-building. Monetization would later be introduced gently through “Pay What You Can” donations, low-friction affiliate marketing, or premium downloadable guides, with long-term B2B revenue from anonymized market insights.• Critique of Operational Realities: This model faced criticism for requiring substantial scale for B2B revenue, intensive moderation for community spaces, and continuous content updates, which were deemed unsustainable for a solo founder.
• Final Pivot to “Authority & Brand” Framework: Recognizing the operational complexities, the final pivot was to a pure content and expertise model. The core product would be a blog, a YouTube channel, and a newsletter, providing high-value, free educational content and product reviews from lived experience. Monetization would primarily be through affiliate marketing, selling information products (e-books), and eventually consulting/partnerships based on the founder’s expertise. This approach prioritized scalability, capital-efficiency, and authenticity.
Claude AI” offered a crucial critique of the “good neighbor” strategy, acknowledging its practical merit for harm reduction but highlighting its limitations in addressing systemic issues. Claude pointed out that while individual behavior helps, it places the burden on individuals to manage systemic problems and creates a precarious existence. This feedback prompted MBRACE to integrate a more honest, empowering approach, acknowledging the duality of individual actions within broader systemic challenges, and considering separate advocacy resources.
Differentiation from Competitors like iOverlander A key challenge was differentiating MBRACE from existing apps like iOverlander. The discussion highlighted that while iOverlander serves the “lifestyle traveler,” MBRACE aimed to be a “Dignity and Safety App” for the economically-strained car dweller. Its unique value would lie in providing specific data points like “Hostility Scores” (user-reported interactions with property owners/law enforcement), “Real-time Facility Status” (cleanliness of public restrooms), and “Community Compliance” metrics, which are not relevant to iOverlander’s adventure-focused user base. The focus was on “trust, not on volume” of data, catering to the core need for peace of mind in legal and safe urban parking.
Based on the sources and our conversation history, several key reasons emerge for why businesses, particularly in the context of the MBRACE project, might fail:
• Unclear or Misaligned Value Proposition
◦ Lack of Sufficient Initial Value: Early models of MBRACE were critiqued for not offering enough immediate value for an initial subscription, especially to a financially-strained audience. Charging upfront can be a massive barrier to entry and conflict with a mission of empathy.
◦ Diluted Core Purpose: Broadly targeting “nomads, car-dwellers, and urban explorers” was identified as a mistake that overlooks critical differences in needs and financial situations, leading to diluted messaging and less effective resources. Focusing on too many segments at once can prevent effectively serving any single one.
◦ Conflict Between Ideal and Pragmatic Solutions: A business model built on “ideal” solutions (e.g., exclusively legal parking) can fail if users facing immediate crises prioritize pragmatic, albeit potentially non-compliant, options for survival. Users needing parking at 11 PM might choose a comprehensive, even if sometimes “gray-area,” database over a limited, “legal-only” one if options are scarce.
• Data Acquisition and Competitive Challenges
◦ “Chicken-and-Egg” Problem: The difficulty of acquiring enough valuable data to attract users while needing users to generate that data is a significant hurdle.
◦ Competition with Established Players: MBRACE faced the challenge of competing with apps like iOverlander, which already have years of user-generated content and extensive databases. Simply having “more data points” is not enough; differentiation must come from different data points serving a different purpose.
◦ Constraints on Data Collection: Apple’s strict privacy guidelines, particularly regarding location data and user-generated content, can prevent the collection of the type of crowdsourced information that made competitors successful. Apps that promote illegal activities, even if user-generated, are on a fast track to rejection.
◦ Limited Actionable Data from Privacy-First Approach: While privacy-preserving, metrics like “Did you find this location helpful?” provide limited actionable data compared to what enterprise partners might require for significant B2B revenue.
• Operational Complexity and Resource Mismanagement
◦ Unsustainable Moderation Burden: Platforms with user-generated content (UGC), especially forums, require intensive, continuous moderation to filter objectionable material and address reports within Apple’s 24-hour requirement. This is a massive, often impossible, operational burden for a solo founder.
◦ Continuous Content Creation and Updates: A “living guide” model demands constant updates to maintain relevance as legal ordinances, business policies, and enforcement patterns evolve across multiple cities. This requires significant resources or risks providing outdated, potentially harmful information.
◦ Non-Scalable Acquisition Models: Manual, “high-touch” user acquisition, while authentic, is not scalable and consumes enormous time and resources for uncertain returns.
• Flawed Business and Monetization Strategies
◦ Unrealistic B2B Revenue Expectations: The assumption that anonymized behavioral data will generate meaningful B2B revenue requires substantial user scale and data quality, which can take years to develop. Sales of market insights to enterprise customers typically require data from thousands or tens of thousands of users.
◦ Cash Flow Gaps: Delaying all monetization until after proving retention creates a dangerous cash flow gap, especially for apps with high development and verification costs.
◦ Misjudgment of Audience Willingness to Pay: Assuming economically-strained users will pay for convenience features (e.g., premium subscriptions) when their primary concern is finding any safe spot is a critical misjudgment.
◦ Vanity Metrics Focus: Focusing on “community engagement” or “app downloads” rather than metrics directly tied to solving the core problem (e.g., “weekly active users who successfully found legal overnight parking”) can lead to a false sense of success.
• Strategic Blind Spots and Missed Trade-offs
◦ Product Knowledge Gaps: Not fully understanding competitors’ user bases and the underlying reasons for their design choices (e.g., Victron’s interface prioritizes reliability over aesthetics for a specific market).
◦ Stakeholder Blind Spots: Failing to consider critical stakeholders beyond users and direct partners, such as local governments, business owners, and law enforcement, whose actions can significantly impact the model’s sustainability.
◦ Unquantified Trade-offs: Emphasizing “legal-only” content trades market size for regulatory safety, but the actual impact of this trade-off (e.g., how many users are excluded) may not be adequately quantified.
Ultimately, the repeated pivots of MBRACE highlight that businesses fail not just from a single mistake, but often from a combination of these factors, especially when core assumptions about user needs, market demand, and operational capacity are not rigorously validated. The most sustainable path often involves focusing on a specific, defensible value proposition and building an authentic brand that can scale within its actual operational capacity
Basically the problem was I wasted all this time: Before choosing any type of digital product, or business. Always start with the question: “What problem have you personally faced and solved and con provide value?” Ultimately I need much more specific path, to solve one issue, that can actually provide value. Realistically there’s no money to be made here. I love the idea, but the ability to actually make money from this idea would require way too much time and the money isn’t there which this niche. So really using your own personal unique experience, establishing your authentic self and brand, solving a problem, but also keep in mind that in order to make money the niche needs to focus on industries that actually can provide value. Hasan, I have been watching your work on YouTube for years, and it’s incredible to see all the effort and dedication. You have established yourself as an authority figure in your niche, which is hugely competitive, by consistently producing high-quality content every day, working towards building this business in the right way. I admire that and look forward to engaging with the community!!
-
I apologize also for the lengthy comment, but I just wanted to illustrate how most business ideas fail consistently. The energy you invest in becoming “the authority” in a space might generate better returns when applied to opportunities with larger addressable markets or audiences with higher spending capacity. Sometimes, the most critical business insight is recognizing when something shouldn’t be a business, even if it addresses real problems.
-
-